<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Recursive &#187; Tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/tag/tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com</link>
	<description>adjective: see &#039;Recursive&#039;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:04:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox still has memory leak issue?</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-still-has-memory-leak-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-still-has-memory-leak-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had to kill Firefox earlier today after noticing that it was using around 750MB of memory! It hung when I tried to close it normally, but perhaps I was just impatient. This time I&#8217;m going to give it the benefit of doubt and blame some crappy Flash advert or something.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-still-has-memory-leak-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You get what you pay for&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/you-get-what-you-pay-for/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/you-get-what-you-pay-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parceline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pcw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techguys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/you-get-what-you-pay-for/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PC World, TechGuys (PC Service Call), Parceline &#8211; One of them screwed up. The fianceé&#8217;s laptop died on a Thursday. It would POST, but it would simply restart itself before Windows started loading. It&#8217;s a Vista machine so I tried to use its self-repair options, but to no avail. I took it to work to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/you-get-what-you-pay-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NatWest Anti-Fraud Team: Impressive</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/natwest-anti-fraud-team-impressive/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/natwest-anti-fraud-team-impressive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natwest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy/Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/natwest-anti-fraud-team-impressive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite my reservations regarding NatWest&#8217;s Card Reader, I wish to voice how impressed I was with their Anti-Fraud Team. DreamHost&#8217;s incredible billing blunder resulted in some peculiar charges to my card. So when I was trying to pay what I actually owed, it was denied by the issuer. I tried a few times (just in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/natwest-anti-fraud-team-impressive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC Homepage Beta Using jQuery</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/bbc-homepage-beta-using-jquery/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/bbc-homepage-beta-using-jquery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jquery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[js]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/bbc-homepage-beta-using-jquery/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BBC Beta Homepage is using jQuery, but unfortunately it&#8217;s ugly. I should qualify that &#8211; I think it&#8217;s a good move to make the homepage more personalisable, but does it have to look so Web2.0? Big text was a fad a year ago, but it&#8217;s too informal for an internationally recognised and respected news [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/bbc-homepage-beta-using-jquery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3 / Skype Marketing Technique</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/3-skype-marketing-technique/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/3-skype-marketing-technique/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/3-skype-marketing-technique/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was recently contacted by Matt of 3mobilebuzz.com and offered the chance to trial a pair of 3 (the network) Skype (the VoIP company) mobile phones (3skypephone.com) for a month. (No obligation to do anything, other than the mention of returning them after a month.) I thought it was an interesting marketing ploy &#8211; it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/3-skype-marketing-technique/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JavaScript Bug &#8211; Modulo of small numbers</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/javascript-bug-modulo-of-small-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/javascript-bug-modulo-of-small-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[js]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/javascript-bug-modulo-of-small-numbers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that there is a problem with the modulo function, &#8216;%&#8217;, in JavaScript. For example: 10 % 0.1 should equate to zero but comes out as 0.09999999999999945 probably due to some internal floating-point rounding errors. Easy solution (a hack really): Multiply both numbers by 1000 before using the modulo function.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/javascript-bug-modulo-of-small-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I might leave my bank: The NatWest Card Reader</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/why-i-might-leave-my-bank-the-natwest-card-reader/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/why-i-might-leave-my-bank-the-natwest-card-reader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[card reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natwest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/2007/06/15/why-i-might-leave-my-bank-the-natwest-card-reader/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have received in the post a Card Reader from NatWest. They have designed this device to beef up the security around the (excellent btw) online banking. The flaw? The fact that we will eventually have to take the damn thing everywhere you go. And the card of course. The whole point of online banking [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/why-i-might-leave-my-bank-the-natwest-card-reader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>158</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IE7 Tip &#8211; Reload</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/ie7-tip-reload/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/ie7-tip-reload/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 12:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/2007/05/30/ie7-tip-reload/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When IE7 was designed they took the peculiar decision to split the navigation buttons into three places (if you include the home button). If you find yourself up in the top left wanting to reload, just click the drop-down button and select the current page (will be highlighted and have a tick-mark on the left), [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/ie7-tip-reload/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox Tip</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-tip/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-tip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 20:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/2007/05/26/firefox-tip/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I discovered yesterday that bookmarks in Firefox can have no name. Seems pointless? Not if the sites have favicons: Space saving, so you can see more, hence fewer clicks. The above are jazzle.co.uk, The Sketchup Components Collection, bit-tech, ebay, amazon, radiotimes.com and the default icon (for a site with no favicon), but you knew that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-tip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Browser Wars (not much fighting)</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/browser-wars-not-much-fighting/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/browser-wars-not-much-fighting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/2007/02/15/browser-wars-not-much-fighting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having created the new Saints site, I have access to the visitor statistics. I was surprised to see that over the first 9 days (27,682 visits, 10.6GB) 92.2% were using Internet Explorer, and I was more surprised to see that ~57% of those were still using IE6. So more than half of all visitors are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/browser-wars-not-much-fighting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
