
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Recursive &#187; Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/category/tech/web-tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com</link>
	<description>adjective: see &#039;Recursive&#039;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:22:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CSS3: Rounded Table Corners (No images)</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/css3-rounded-table-corners-no-images/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/css3-rounded-table-corners-no-images/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 07:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/?p=220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You cannot give a whole table (&#60;table>) rounded corners using CSS, browsers will ignore it, you must round the corners of the cells (&#60;td>) inside. The following uses CSS2 selectors (:first-child etc) and CSS3&#8242;s corner-rounding border-radius to selectively round the &#8230; <a href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/css3-rounded-table-corners-no-images/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/css3-rounded-table-corners-no-images/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PHP Bug: json_encode() misleading warning on object with private properties</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/php-bug-json_encode-misleading-warning-on-object-with-private-properties/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/php-bug-json_encode-misleading-warning-on-object-with-private-properties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[json]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[php]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have found a peculiar issue with PHP&#8217;s json_encode() function. If you have an instance object with private properties and use json_encode() it will give you a very misleading warning. class ExampleObject { private $privateProperty; ... } $obj = new &#8230; <a href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/php-bug-json_encode-misleading-warning-on-object-with-private-properties/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/php-bug-json_encode-misleading-warning-on-object-with-private-properties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox still has memory leak issue?</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-still-has-memory-leak-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-still-has-memory-leak-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had to kill Firefox earlier today after noticing that it was using around 750MB of memory! It hung when I tried to close it normally, but perhaps I was just impatient. This time I&#8217;m going to give it the &#8230; <a href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-still-has-memory-leak-issue/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-still-has-memory-leak-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BT (Bastards Telepunish) Woes</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/bt-bastards-telepunish-woes/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/bt-bastards-telepunish-woes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 09:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My ISP, BT, have got my goat again. They&#8217;re punishing me by crippling my (already joke-worthy) download speeds, because I used a lot last week. So they&#8217;ll probably charge me for that (fair enough, I suppose). I understand that they &#8230; <a href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/bt-bastards-telepunish-woes/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/bt-bastards-telepunish-woes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 3 to break Zoom (Edit: I&#8217;m mistaken)</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-3-to-break-zoom/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-3-to-break-zoom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zooming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mozilla is about the make a big mistake, the same as that made by IE7. Zooming the whole page is not a good idea. Current Firefox text-only zoom on the left, IE7 on the right. Using the current Fx way &#8230; <a href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-3-to-break-zoom/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-3-to-break-zoom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NatWest Anti-Fraud Team: Impressive</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/natwest-anti-fraud-team-impressive/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/natwest-anti-fraud-team-impressive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natwest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy/Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/natwest-anti-fraud-team-impressive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite my reservations regarding NatWest&#8217;s Card Reader, I wish to voice how impressed I was with their Anti-Fraud Team. DreamHost&#8217;s incredible billing blunder resulted in some peculiar charges to my card. So when I was trying to pay what I &#8230; <a href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/natwest-anti-fraud-team-impressive/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/natwest-anti-fraud-team-impressive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC Homepage Beta Using jQuery</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/bbc-homepage-beta-using-jquery/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/bbc-homepage-beta-using-jquery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jquery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[js]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/bbc-homepage-beta-using-jquery/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BBC Beta Homepage is using jQuery, but unfortunately it&#8217;s ugly. I should qualify that &#8211; I think it&#8217;s a good move to make the homepage more personalisable, but does it have to look so Web2.0? Big text was a &#8230; <a href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/bbc-homepage-beta-using-jquery/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/bbc-homepage-beta-using-jquery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BT (&#8216;British&#8217; Tele-extortion) Woes</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/bt-british-tele-extortion-woes/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/bt-british-tele-extortion-woes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 10:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/bt-british-tele-extortion-woes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BT have me in a head-lock. I get my phone and broadband service from them, and am charged, on average, £30 per month. This is not overly excessive, but I wanted to reduce it somehow, since I&#8217;ve been made better &#8230; <a href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/bt-british-tele-extortion-woes/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/bt-british-tele-extortion-woes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JavaScript Bug &#8211; Modulo of small numbers</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/javascript-bug-modulo-of-small-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/javascript-bug-modulo-of-small-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 09:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[js]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/javascript-bug-modulo-of-small-numbers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that there is a problem with the modulo function, &#8216;%&#8217;, in JavaScript. For example: 10 % 0.1 should equate to zero but comes out as 0.09999999999999945 probably due to some internal floating-point rounding errors. Easy solution (a hack &#8230; <a href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/javascript-bug-modulo-of-small-numbers/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/javascript-bug-modulo-of-small-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recursive Moved Itself</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/recursive-moved-itself/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/recursive-moved-itself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jazzle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/recursive-moved-itself/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The highly observant amongst you may have noticed that I have moved this blog to my personal domain, jezmckean.com. You should have been brought to this domain automatically, and I hope to fix the multitude of links online, but need &#8230; <a href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/recursive-moved-itself/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/recursive-moved-itself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

