
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Recursive &#187; Tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/category/tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com</link>
	<description>adjective: see &#039;Recursive&#039;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:22:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CSS3: Rounded Table Corners (No images)</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/css3-rounded-table-corners-no-images/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/css3-rounded-table-corners-no-images/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 07:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/?p=220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You cannot give a whole table (&#60;table>) rounded corners using CSS, browsers will ignore it, you must round the corners of the cells (&#60;td>) inside. The following uses CSS2 selectors (:first-child etc) and CSS3&#8242;s corner-rounding border-radius to selectively round the &#8230; <a href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/css3-rounded-table-corners-no-images/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/css3-rounded-table-corners-no-images/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PHP Bug: json_encode() misleading warning on object with private properties</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/php-bug-json_encode-misleading-warning-on-object-with-private-properties/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/php-bug-json_encode-misleading-warning-on-object-with-private-properties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[json]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[php]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have found a peculiar issue with PHP&#8217;s json_encode() function. If you have an instance object with private properties and use json_encode() it will give you a very misleading warning. class ExampleObject { private $privateProperty; ... } $obj = new &#8230; <a href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/php-bug-json_encode-misleading-warning-on-object-with-private-properties/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/php-bug-json_encode-misleading-warning-on-object-with-private-properties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10/GUI</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/10gui/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/10gui/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HCI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[10gui.com This is as much an HCI concept as it is about the GUI. I think a multitouch pad would be great. 5 fingers, i.e. one hand, would be plenty though, and having one hand remaining on the keyboard allows &#8230; <a href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/10gui/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/10gui/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox still has memory leak issue?</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-still-has-memory-leak-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-still-has-memory-leak-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had to kill Firefox earlier today after noticing that it was using around 750MB of memory! It hung when I tried to close it normally, but perhaps I was just impatient. This time I&#8217;m going to give it the &#8230; <a href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-still-has-memory-leak-issue/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-still-has-memory-leak-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BT (Bastards Telepunish) Woes</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/bt-bastards-telepunish-woes/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/bt-bastards-telepunish-woes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 09:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My ISP, BT, have got my goat again. They&#8217;re punishing me by crippling my (already joke-worthy) download speeds, because I used a lot last week. So they&#8217;ll probably charge me for that (fair enough, I suppose). I understand that they &#8230; <a href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/bt-bastards-telepunish-woes/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/bt-bastards-telepunish-woes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 3 to break Zoom (Edit: I&#8217;m mistaken)</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-3-to-break-zoom/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-3-to-break-zoom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zooming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mozilla is about the make a big mistake, the same as that made by IE7. Zooming the whole page is not a good idea. Current Firefox text-only zoom on the left, IE7 on the right. Using the current Fx way &#8230; <a href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-3-to-break-zoom/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/firefox-3-to-break-zoom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Automatically Added Start Menu / Desktop Icons</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/automatically-added-start-menu-desktop-icons/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/automatically-added-start-menu-desktop-icons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annoyances]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have just allowed Adobe (Acrobat) Reader to update itself, fair enough, though it is still remarkably slow to load on first use. I keep a clean desktop, with shortcuts only for the things I use on a regular basis &#8230; <a href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/automatically-added-start-menu-desktop-icons/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/automatically-added-start-menu-desktop-icons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You get what you pay for&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/you-get-what-you-pay-for/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/you-get-what-you-pay-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parceline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pcw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techguys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/you-get-what-you-pay-for/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PC World, TechGuys (PC Service Call), Parceline &#8211; One of them screwed up. The fianceé&#8217;s laptop died on a Thursday. It would POST, but it would simply restart itself before Windows started loading. It&#8217;s a Vista machine so I tried &#8230; <a href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/you-get-what-you-pay-for/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/you-get-what-you-pay-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NatWest Anti-Fraud Team: Impressive</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/natwest-anti-fraud-team-impressive/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/natwest-anti-fraud-team-impressive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natwest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy/Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/natwest-anti-fraud-team-impressive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite my reservations regarding NatWest&#8217;s Card Reader, I wish to voice how impressed I was with their Anti-Fraud Team. DreamHost&#8217;s incredible billing blunder resulted in some peculiar charges to my card. So when I was trying to pay what I &#8230; <a href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/natwest-anti-fraud-team-impressive/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/natwest-anti-fraud-team-impressive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC Homepage Beta Using jQuery</title>
		<link>http://blog.jezmckean.com/bbc-homepage-beta-using-jquery/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.jezmckean.com/bbc-homepage-beta-using-jquery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jquery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[js]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jezmckean.com/bbc-homepage-beta-using-jquery/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BBC Beta Homepage is using jQuery, but unfortunately it&#8217;s ugly. I should qualify that &#8211; I think it&#8217;s a good move to make the homepage more personalisable, but does it have to look so Web2.0? Big text was a &#8230; <a href="http://blog.jezmckean.com/bbc-homepage-beta-using-jquery/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.jezmckean.com/bbc-homepage-beta-using-jquery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

